Hanbok is the traditional Korean costume, worn by both Koreans and diasporic Korean-Americans at weddings and celebrations. Many people mistake them for Japanese kimonos, but they are very different, especially at the bottom. Kimonos are held tightly, funneling narrowly at the legs, and limiting the wearer’s movement. Hanboks on the other hand are open at the bottom, resembling wide-funneled Regency dresses. They are not constrictive in shape, and allow for freedom of movement. They speak, in a way, to the paradoxical situation of women in traditional Korea. While they lived fairly circumscribed lives, Korean women also enjoyed certain symbolic and literal freedoms–symbolic in terms of being able to keep their maiden names (Korean women do not take their husbands’ names), and literal in being afforded a freedom of physical movement not often allowed in other nations abiding to Confucian beliefs.

Hanboks are very colorful, and it’s what women traditionally wore–at home and outside. They’re made up of a short, narrow jacket tied down tightly at the breasts, and a long, wide skirt, usually of a different color. Color was an important part of a hanbok’s selection, informing others not only of the wearer’s taste, but also her social situation, marital status, and wealth. Made of silk and ramie, hanboks are structured and built in such a brilliant architectural way as to prevent the fabric from sitting dully over the wearer’s body. Ideally, the skirt part of the hanbok floats slightly above the body, creating the feeling of lightness and elegance.

Nowadays, hanboks are relegated to wedding celebrations, and reserved to the older members of the wedding party, like the mothers and grandmothers of the couple. But like Indian saris and Japanese kimonos, they immediately transport both the wearers and the viewers to a distant, intriguing past.

(Photo of the film Hwang Jin Yi, about a courtesan who falls in love with a male servant.)


5 thoughts on “Hanboks

  1. This is absolutely fascinating. I can’t believe I was so ignorant of this beautiful form of dress. I just Googled some pictures of Hanboks and they’re lovely–much more constructed than kimonos. Indeed almost Jane Austen-y in shape. And so colorful. And I didn’t know Korean women always kept their own names. I’m going to be very interested to read your book.

  2. Wow! That was really interesting. I had no idea there was a difference. They all look beautiful to me, lol!

  3. Karen Lange says:

    This looks great, Samuel!

  4. I found this so interesting. Hanboks really do look elegant. Your website looks great, Sam. Congratulations again on your new book coming out.

  5. Samuel Park says:

    @Anne–Thank you. So glad you stopped by.

    @Natalie–thanks for the comment. Glad you made the trek from the original blog.

    @Karen–Thank you!

    @Elizabeth–thank you; I appreciate the kind words!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: